Which is more vulgar the Iraq War or the 48,589,993

[lives7]

unborn children murder through Abortion in America? 48,589,993 innocent lives murdered. Stop the Killing. End the War on the unborn children of America.Which blood shedding is more immoral?I support neither, so my hands are clean.Yet, the blood of innocent children continues to be shed this very day.I oppose the death penalty.Life is not created through abstinence.But abortion kills the life that we each lived through our development.

[xTheurgata]

The Iraq War, definitely.The vast majority of fetuses that are aborted are at a developmental stage where they are aware of nothing, feel nothing, think nothing. They do not have the brain structures yet to have any sort of consciousness at all. Not so with the huge number of thinking, feeling, suffering casualties and their friends and relatives who watch them die or remain crippled, blinded and maimed because of the war. This suffering is immense and horrifying.Southsider: I have volunteered at clinics before, actually.

[kenny p]

the 49 million babies hands downThe war has kept 1000's of other Americans from being killed here at home on our own soilWhile war is a terrible thing, it is sometimes neccesary

[alanpballou]

I believe the record number of people who have lost their jobs over the past 8 years here in the USA far out ways any of those.If I may be of service to anyone please contact me (1 Peter 4:10).Respectfully,Alan Ballouwww.thehealingbook.com

[Sick Puppy]

48 million, 589 thousand, 9 hundred and ninety-three? I don't think so.

[Dean S]

Which is more vulgar, 48,589,993 unborn children murder through Abortion in America or the countless hundred billions of unborn children murdered through abstinence?You've got yourself into quite the pickle my friend. =\If you wish to discuss the stages of human development and "life" then I will gladly do so. If we go back even further then we reach a point in which we were all at one time a sperm and an egg. The sperm within the male testicles are technically alive aren't they? Technically they are unborn babies waiting to fertilize the eggs and reach their next stage. Now what abstinence does is keep these sperm from performing their duties and advancing to the next stage. They remain until they are flushed out by the body and replaced, thus resulting in the deaths of the tens of millions of "potential" babies. The same can be said for the eggs within a female to a smaller extent. Who are you to say that these sperm did not possess life? Where do we draw the line? What authority do you have to draw that line?

[Averell A]

Both! Should it always be either or?

[chdoctor]

Both are equally immoral. However, some of the killing done in Iraq is a matter of self-defense: something never causing the death of the pre-born.

[southsider]

to the prochoice folks, why havent you finished what you believe in...better yet, work for a a clinic, and see how they suck life out of your friends, sisters, mothers, and watch the video, and make sure the mike is on so you can really grasp the murdering process

[Elliot B.]

The War on Terror is not immoral. You may not agree with it, but we had to do something about it. Either way, abortion is so much worse. I'm so glad someone else besides me is pro-life.

[bob shark]

If God didn't like abortion or war, he wouldn't permit it.

[JC247]

It's absolutely staggering!!! The fact that we've allowed so many lives to be sacrificed at the alter of convenience! Just imagine, we'll see all these souls, who've never touched the earth that GOD created, in Heaven!