View Full Version : Why did lung cancer rates not increase until 1950's if
junky_pal
12-11-2007, 03:35 AM
the? Inthe early 1920s, shortly after world war 1, smoking became fashionable for men. Why didnt lung cancer start increasing untill 1950?
mattrunltd
12-11-2007, 11:53 PM
Dunno,........I remember I saw something about that a long time ago....I think they said it had something to do with pesticides,and that they couldn't find a direct link to lung cancer and smoking.
whythefrowngirl
12-12-2007, 08:20 AM
How many yrs do you have to smoke till you get lung cancer? I've been smoking for 25 yrs and so far so good. It probably takes 30 - 50 yrs to get it. Also, the first person to respond to your Q nailed it with the lack of research, etc.
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.